Notifications
Clear all

Hole size compensation  

  RSS
ed brakus
(@ed-brakus)
Member
Hole size compensation

I have a lot of CAD designed items for printing.  These interoperate with non-printed mechanical parts, so I need to keep the CAD designs true, rather than compensating in the CAD design for holes printing smaller than per-design.

I've tried hole compensation in other slicers and while I am able to dial in the size I need, doing so always introduces other artifacts that are problematic.

I tried the XY size compensation in Prusa Slicer but this seems to impact everything not just holes.   There are other things to tweak in the print settings but I'm starting to suspect I'll pay a price for anything, and that this is just not the best layer in the workflow for hole size compensation.

Wondering if any of you have worked out a clever trick for this, like maybe some automated pre-processing step after CAD but before slicing.

I dont want to manually edit  a second set of design docs every time a make a change,  I would. bleed out on that.

Thanks.

Napsal : 09/06/2023 3:57 pm
Diem
 Diem
(@diem)
Illustrious Member
RE: Hole size compensation

Just make the hole settings parametric and set a conditional for additive/subtractive implementation; then calibrate for the working values.

Cheerio,

Napsal : 09/06/2023 11:51 pm
ed brakus se líbí
FoxRun3D
(@foxrun3d)
Famed Member
RE:

There's no simply trick, just try and error. Too much dependent on geometry, printer tolerances, and material properties. 

Formerly known on this forum as @fuchsr -- until all hell broke loose with the forum software...

Napsal : 10/06/2023 12:59 am
ed brakus
(@ed-brakus)
Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Hole size compensation

I had to dig into that a little bit since some of it was unfamiliar, but it was exactly the sort of thing I've been looking for.  Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.

 

Cheers

_E

 

Napsal : 10/06/2023 1:11 am
Golf League Tracker
(@golf-league-tracker)
Member
RE: Hole size compensation

"Just make the hole settings parametric and set a conditional for additive/subtractive implementation; then calibrate for the working values."

The problem with this is that if you're designing a model to be uploaded to printables or thingiverse, you want your model to be dimensionally accurate, and not modeled for your specific printer setup. This needs to be an adjustment a user makes.

Or take the situation where you have two different printers which have different tolerances. Now you have to adjust the model to each printer. Not a good solution.

Napsal : 19/03/2024 2:25 pm
Diem
 Diem
(@diem)
Illustrious Member

designing a model to be uploaded to printables or thingiverse,

It's no longer worth uploading, the effort required properly to test and document a part is wasted.

But if he calibrations are parametric the user can recalibrate...

two different printers which have different tolerances

Again, parametric recalibration addresses the issue.

Cheerio,

Napsal : 20/03/2024 3:51 am
Share: