RE:
Improvements
- After running input shaper and phase stepping calibration, subjectively printer seems quieter.
Question: Is it needed to run input shaper and phase stepper calibration after a firmware upgrade, or were you simply curious? I am trying to learn the normal recommended process after each firmware update.
Thanks!
In this case, running the input shaper is necessary since there was (apparently) a long standing bug that had X and Y swapped. Noise reduction is a function of phase stepping calibration. With the input shaping there is an obvious improvement with a print that once exhibited ringing and ghosting now that it's been fixed. With the phase stepping I don't have anything quantitive (like a before/after DB reading) to compare it too. It just "seems" quieter.
RE: 6.5.3-beta Firmware for PrusaCORE One/+
I suppose one could just make two prints, one with the numbers as-is and one with them swapped. Should work with old or new revision.
RE:
Improvements
- After running input shaper and phase stepping calibration, subjectively printer seems quieter.
Question: Is it needed to run input shaper and phase stepper calibration after a firmware upgrade, or were you simply curious? I am trying to learn the normal recommended process after each firmware update.
Thanks!
I'd say normally its not needed to re-run IS and PS calibration, in this instance its 100% required as the X/Y values were reversed, and have now been corrected.
If there are any future changes in IS/PS logic then re-run the calibration also.