PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: cannot open shared object file
 
Notifications
Clear all

PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: cannot open shared object file  

  RSS
Rikky0
(@rikky0)
Member
PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: cannot open shared object file

After upgrading Prusaslicer I get the following error

PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 /tmp/.mount_PrusaSZR9Gse/usr/bin/bin/prusa-slicer: error while

I'm running sklackware 15.0 the 2.7.4 version worked fine

I looked for the libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37 and indeed it is not on my system

Now my question is, do more people suffer from this? and should I create this as

Richard

Posted : 27/06/2024 7:09 pm
JimB
 JimB
(@jimb)
Estimable Member
RE: PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: cannot open shared object file

I just tried it and got the same error on Ubuntu 24.04.

 

Posted : 27/06/2024 9:38 pm
JimB
 JimB
(@jimb)
Estimable Member
RE: PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: cannot open shared object file

https://github.com/prusa3d/PrusaSlicer/issues/12931

Posted : 27/06/2024 9:42 pm
_KaszpiR_
(@_kaszpir_)
Honorable Member
RE: PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: cannot open shared object file

It's stated on the release page:

We now provide two separate AppImages. One depends on the old WebKit, the other one is built on Ubuntu 24.04 and links to the new WebKit. If you run Ubuntu 20.04, Fedora 40 or another very recent distribution, you should download the "Ubuntu-20-04" AppImage. The other one will not work for you.

See my GitHub and printables.com for some 3d stuff that you may like.

Posted : 28/06/2024 7:13 am
Michiel
(@michiel-2)
New Member
RE: PrusaSlicer-2.8.0 libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: cannot open shared object file

t's stated on the release page:

We now provide two separate AppImages. One depends on the old WebKit, the other one is built on Ubuntu 24.04 and links to the new WebKit. If you run Ubuntu 20.04, Fedora 40 or another very recent distribution, you should download the "Ubuntu-20-04" AppImage. The other one will not work for you.

Feedback to the team it might be good to rethink the filename for the other version-name , it doesn´t match other current up2date users if they need a appimage with ubuntu in the name? 

second question : why push the incorrect image as standard to users as it will not work for all users  maybe the release page instead of a not working file smart?

Posted : 28/06/2024 4:03 pm
Diem
 Diem
(@diem)
Illustrious Member

There's no ARM image either - 2.7.4 does run on Raspberry Pi but only in command-line mode - I was hoping that 2.8 would remedy this.  The autodownloader just fetches the x86 builds.

Cheerio,

Posted : 29/06/2024 4:26 pm
Share: