Su di me
Today I found a reviving article that shows the lost cause spent on attempting to compel cyclists to wear helmets and why that energy ought to be centered rather around making roads more secure for cycling. Here is a tomfoolery portion:
"That is pretty much what the scandalous helmet banter has become," Hussey bemoaned. "Shouty outsiders yelling at other shouty outsiders for decisions that don't influence the first shouty more odd's life. It's a piece peculiar, most certainly a hopeless cause, and not a tomfoolery place for cyclists to share space in."
As Boardman noted, in the Netherlands, maybe the most un-dangerous country for cyclists on the planet, helmets and greetings vis are practically obscure. You don't make cycling protected by obliging each rider to take on the appearance of if for metropolitan fighting. You do it by making a street framework that protects them from quick and flighty street traffic.
Firma