PrusaControl is much slower to render and slice in 415 than 390 for MacOS
 
Avisos
Vaciar todo

PrusaControl is much slower to render and slice in 415 than 390 for MacOS  

  RSS
JoshFink
(@joshfink)
Active Member
PrusaControl is much slower to render and slice in 415 than 390 for MacOS

I'm not sure if this effects Windows as well as the Mac but I'm seeing some strange behavior with the new version.

When dragging a gcode file into PC 415 it takes 24m21seconds to read the file and then display and show the estimated time. The same file in 390 beta takes 3 minutes.

Some more detailed info
2017 MacBook Pro Touchpad
16GB Ram
MacOS 10.3.1

.93_390_beta - Takes 3 minutes to read and render and estimates the total time is 7h 46mins
.93_415_beta - Takes 9m28seconds to read the file to 100% but then doesn't render or display the estimated time until 24m 21seconds. The estimated time is 21h 28m on 415 beta.

The real actual time to print this on my MK2S was 8h 3min.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Respondido : 03/12/2017 3:56 am
ecog
 ecog
(@ecog)
New Member
Re: PrusaControl is much slower to render and slice in 415 than 390 for MacOS

I've had the same issues since the update (runing on a mid-2012 unibody macbook pro with an ssd). I love prusacontrol, and I use it for about 95% of my prints, but the slowness is an issue. It has taken a noticably longer time a start up since the update, and the gcode preview takes way more time to load than it should. Basically everything in the software takes about 3-4x as much time since the 9.4_415 update. I hope the prusa team are able to optimize it a bit better in future updates.

Respondido : 23/12/2017 6:13 pm
Compartir: