Upgraded a MK3 to MK3S+. Now the flow rate is slightly different. Can it be permanently set on the printer?
 
Notifications
Clear all

Upgraded a MK3 to MK3S+. Now the flow rate is slightly different. Can it be permanently set on the printer?  

  RSS
J
 J
(@j)
Eminent Member
Upgraded a MK3 to MK3S+. Now the flow rate is slightly different. Can it be permanently set on the printer?

The MK3S+ seems to have a lower flow rate than the MK3 had: I ran the same Gcode file, a simple PETG part that the MK3 had made dozens of before its upgrade. The MK3S+ print attempts had bed-adhesion problems, really sketchy infill, and sparse-looking perimeters. I adjusted Flow on the printer to 110, and those problems immediately went away.

But this Flow adjustment resets when the printer's rebooted.

I also don't want to change the flow multiplier in PrusaSlicer because I'm running MK3 and MK3S+ printers. The PrusaSlicer settings I've been using all along won't work on the MK3S+ because of its different flow level, and I'd prefer not to have to now use two sets of Gcode to run different printers. If I do really need to... I guess that's how it is, but some permanent adjustment on the printer would be good.

I tried the M500 (Save Settings) command on it, but Flow went back to 100 after a reboot.

 

Napsal : 05/05/2023 6:01 pm
Diem
 Diem
(@diem)
Illustrious Member

You should be able to use the preset profile without problems.

I suggest a cold pull in case there is a partial clog confusing the issue.

Cheerio,

Napsal : 06/05/2023 11:02 am
J
 J
(@j)
Eminent Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Upgraded a MK3 to MK3S+. Now the flow rate is slightly different. Can it be permanently set on the printer?

Along with the MK3S+ upgrade, I also bought and put in a new hotend and nozzle.
Though that kind of makes less sense - a new hotend should flow more freely than a years-old one that might have crud inside; the new one's putting out less material for whatever reason.

But in the meantime since the original post, I did try something that seems to have worked: M200 + M500.

I used a Gcode file with two commands: M200 D1.575 to set the filament diameter to be about 10% smaller than it really is, and M500 to save it. That seems to have resolved the issue: PETG prints look normal, and the tiny gaps at infill-perimeter interfaces in PLA prints are gone.

 

Napsal : 09/05/2023 12:43 pm
Share: