Notifications
Clear all

Bridging Infill Angle  

  RSS
BrettG
(@brettg)
Estimable Member
Bridging Infill Angle

So looking into which would work better for less sag without using supports.

Default is 90° but I would of thought maybe the 45° being better ? any thoughts or should I stick for the default as maybe that's the obvious answer

thanks

This topic was modified 3 years ago 2 times by BrettG
Posted : 11/11/2021 3:12 pm
bobstro
(@bobstro)
Illustrious Member
RE: Bridging Infill Angle

I wouldn't expect too much sag from an area that small. 

My notes and disclaimers on 3D printing

and miscellaneous other tech projects
He is intelligent, but not experienced. His pattern indicates two dimensional thinking. -- Spock in Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan

Posted : 11/11/2021 3:36 pm
BrettG
(@brettg)
Estimable Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Bridging Infill Angle

 

Posted by: @bobstro

I wouldn't expect too much sag from an area that small. 

ok thanks bob,  so wouldn't really matter to much then on which angle.

Posted : 11/11/2021 3:37 pm
bobstro
(@bobstro)
Illustrious Member
RE: Bridging Infill Angle
Posted by: @brettg

 ok thanks bob,  so wouldn't really matter to much then on which angle.

I'd definitely give it a try with defaults and see how it looks. Unless it's in a visible area, the defaults may be just fine. FYI, the upcoming 2.4 release (currently in Beta) has a lot of new features for support and bridging.

 

My notes and disclaimers on 3D printing

and miscellaneous other tech projects
He is intelligent, but not experienced. His pattern indicates two dimensional thinking. -- Spock in Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan

Posted : 11/11/2021 4:03 pm
BrettG liked
Share: