Notifiche
Cancella tutti

Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem  

  RSS
ILETUB
(@iletub)
Active Member
Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Hello,I would like some advice for printing detailed projects in the same quality as I saw from this post on reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/prusa3d/comments/13w6cuh/the_mk4_with_a_25mm_nozzle_is_pretty_good_at/. I know that FDM printing has limitations but watching the previous link I believe i can have better prints. I have tried to achieve the same results with a 0.25mm nozzle with the 0.07mm preset from prusaslicer, but I got some artefacts (cfr image), so I made some changes in the hope of getting better results

I saw that it was better to put the extrusion multiplier at a lower value for detailed prints so I began with 0.95 extrusion multiplier. Then I tried to reduce the temperature to 210°C  (from 220°C) and it went smoothly, thenI reduced the speed by 66% of its original value. Then again no problem but when I reduced the temperature to 200°C its started clicking. I still don't know if the cause was the temperature since I later saw that the extrusion multiplier went back to 1 (i forgot to save at one point probably, so it may be the cause of the clicking). So i was asking myself if I could get some advices on how to handle detailed prints? Or if there were a pre-made profiles for prusaslicer somewhere (i didn't found any unfortunately)?

Information on the STL I used other than previously mentioned (changes from the 0.07mm preset);

- fill density = 30%

- skirt loops = 2

- organic tree support = 35° overhang treshold, 0.2 contact Z distance, 250% XY separation between an object and its support

- XY size compensation = 0.04

I did not change any retraction settings yet as I wanted to troubleshoot the speed and temperature first.

I use a MK4 prusa (with input shaping update and with silicone socks (firmware was correctly updated with it)), with prusa galaxy black PLA filament, in a Prusa enclosure (leaving the door open when printing)

image below: first try with the 0.07mm preset

first try with no changes made from the 0.07mm preset

image below: result after speed changes and temperature at 210°

result after speed changes and going to 210°

 

 

Any help greatly appreciated 🙂 !

Questa discussione è stata modificata 1 year fa da ILETUB
Postato : 01/11/2023 2:05 pm
Diem
 Diem
(@diem)
Illustrious Member

For detail work you need to begin with a machine in top condition, go through the standard maintenance procedures and clean the print sheet scrupulously; then you need filament in top condition, preferably clear, translucent black or grey, the filaments with the least pigment and the filament must be absolutely dry, dry it for twice the usual time.

Then begin with one of the stock profiles, don't change anything until you've seen what stock can do.

Cheerio,

Postato : 01/11/2023 4:13 pm
ILETUB hanno apprezzato
ILETUB
(@iletub)
Active Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Hello Diem,

Thanks for the tip, ill try that.

thanks very much

 

Postato : 01/11/2023 10:33 pm
ILETUB
(@iletub)
Active Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Hello again,

 

So I tried the rocket reactor from the Prusa files (but smaller). 

I cleaned up the enclosure and used the eSUN cleaning filament to clean the nozzle. I also used Jet black filament which I dried for 10H during the night and then 2H just before printing (at 41°C and via the SUNLU S1). I also put in place a filament filter. 

I did not change any parameter of the 0.07mm preset (except some properties for the supports, and I added a skirt). 

I got this result, which I believe is clearly better than the first tries I got before. Thanks for your advice! 

 

Although this is quite good, I still have some stringing problems, so I was thinking about doing the same tests, but reducing the temperature and then the speed. Also, I saw that for detailed objects, it was better to reduce the extruder multiplier (not much, around 95%) but is it a good idea or can it cause problems other than underextrusion?

Any advice on this?

Also, does somebody know if there is an available guideline for testing detailed objects? 

 21

Thank you in advance, 

Postato : 05/11/2023 1:20 pm
Diem
 Diem
(@diem)
Illustrious Member
RE:

You're certainly moving in the right direction.  0.07mm layer height is still lowish for 0.25mm nozzle (try it at 0.1mm) and will begin to require higher quality filaments and more careful setting up. 

Try a couple of different filaments.

I would also try printing two models at the same time while slowing down the print slightly - the slow print keeps heat on the model for longer but the second model allows cooling catch up.

Once you find a working combination you can try the finer layer heights with better chance of success.

Cheerio,

Postato : 05/11/2023 5:36 pm
ILETUB hanno apprezzato
ILETUB
(@iletub)
Active Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Thanks for the tip! 

May I ask you if you could advise some filament brands or types?

Btw, I had an idea about changing the parameters of the 0.07mm profile with the values of the 0.05mm pre-input shaping profile (speed, temperature, acceleration,….etc). Do you think it can be a good idea?

Thanks very much again. 

Postato : 06/11/2023 11:40 am
Thejiral
(@thejiral)
Noble Member
RE: Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Just as a comment to you initial post where you described reducing the temperature to 200°C or less and then you heard clicking noises... that was your filament starting to clog your extruder. This happens with basically all filaments when you hotend temperature is getting too low. The more retractions you have the easier it happens as well. The difference between filament is (even of the same type) at which temperature this starts to occur. Some PLA filaments for example are less prone to it than other but if you go low enough, it will happen to any of them. If you see it happen at a certain hotend temperature, I would stay 5°C above that hotend temperature. You can also optimize retraction settings, which could help against both, stringing and clogging. You still seem to have a bit of a stringing problem, stringing can btw get actually worse when you are slowing down, even though printing slower helps for almost everything else.  

Mk3s MMU2s, Voron 0.1, Voron 2.4

Postato : 06/11/2023 12:38 pm
ILETUB hanno apprezzato
REIFY 3D
(@reify-3d-2)
Eminent Member
RE: Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Might want to use a neat PLA filament that does not have glitter. Prusament Galaxy Black has some glitter in it and could cause clogging in a 0.25mm nozzle. You can print faster with a lower layer height; if the filament is not extruded quickly enough, it might degrade and then clog the nozzle. Yes, there is a Goldilocks zone and it varies between brands, your specific set up, and objects being printed.

Postato : 06/11/2023 1:46 pm
ILETUB hanno apprezzato
ILETUB
(@iletub)
Active Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Hello,

Thank you for your advices

Postato : 10/11/2023 11:35 am
ILETUB
(@iletub)
Active Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: Detailed 0.25mm MK4 problem

Hello again,

I am back to provide an update on my progress with this project.

First of all, I purchased two additional brands of filament, Esun PLA+ and SUNLU PLA+. I wanted to test them with the reactor object like the previous tests and I dried them around 2 hours at 40°C before printing. So this is the photo of the tests I made. From left to right;

- Prusament Jet black with basic profiles at 220°

-SUNLU PLA+ with PLA general profile which I changed the temp to print at 215°

-ESUN PLA+ with ESUN profile (at 210°C)

-Second test SUNLU PLA+ with PLA general profile (at 200°C)tests

I was quite satisfied with the SUNLU test, so before the second test I tried a temp tower to know at which temperature this type of PLA printed better, and the results were pretty good at 200°C. So I tried the reactor again at 200°C (shown in the photo above) and while there is some stringing left, it is very thin and it leaves little to no artifacts on the print itself. Also, I was quite satisfied with the quality so I was thinking about sticking to SUNLU PLA+. By the way, I did not change any retraction settings or the printing speed so I will look into it another time to try and get other results.

I also tried the same figurine from before and the results were quite good in my opinion. The only real problem I have left is artifacts left by supports but that is another subject.

Thank you all again for your advice it was really helpful😀  

test soldier dwarf test

Postato : 19/11/2023 12:40 pm
Zappes hanno apprezzato
Condividi: