NEXTRUDER NOZZLE FLOW COMPARISON
I compared 3 different nozzles to determine the maximum flow rate in mm3/s. I never thought the values would be so close. Of course, more can be achieved by increasing the temperature.
![]()
It would also be interesting to compare this with the Nextruder CHT nozzles. But I'm not a fan of CHT. I think they clog up more easily and are harder to clean.
I will probably only be able to say how the SiC nozzle performs in a long-term damage test in one to two years. However, I already have a Pheatus nozzle made of tungsten carbide on my Prusa MK3, which I have used a lot for the last two years, and it is still good today. And with it I can print at 10 degrees less temperature than with the Nozzle X from E3D.
The Phaetus SiC Nextruder nozzle only costs around 20€. This means that it is not only better in terms of thermal conductivity and wear resistance but also significantly cheaper. You can buy the nozzle here (affiliate link): https://s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DDh6ZFJ
The filament I used is from Sunlu and is called PLA Meta. It's for speed printing. Normally this is printed at 185-190c. With normal PLA you would need a higher temperature to achieve the same flow rate.
RE: NEXTRUDER NOZZLE FLOW COMPARISON

RE: NEXTRUDER NOZZLE FLOW COMPARISON
I love this test! If I had knowed about this before I bought the obxidion nozzle I've would had waited.
Did you also post a youtube video about this? Don't think to many have seen this.
RE: NEXTRUDER NOZZLE FLOW COMPARISON
Old post, but wondering if the E3D Brass nozzle was the standard brass or the HF brass version?