Error to boot core one
RE: Error to boot core one
RE: Error to boot core one
I understand now, thanks.I'm glad to know I'm not the only one this happens to...
RE:
To @ricardo-3:
Why are you starting another thread? The same problem is described here:
RE: Error to boot core one
To @ricardo-3:
Why are you starting another thread? The same problem is described here:
Miroslav, to be fair to the OP, it's really hard to know one should search for prior topics on this forum if you are a new. He just joined today.
RE: Error to boot core one
Give me a break, this is my first message. I promise I'll do a little more research next time. I'M SORRY
RE: Error to boot core one
To @ricardo-3:
Why are you starting another thread? The same problem is described here:
Miroslav, to be fair to the OP, it's really hard to know one should search for prior topics on this forum if you are a new. He just joined today.
You are somewhat right, but.... I am a moderator on a discussion forum and a new user would hardly allow himself to do this there. First of all, he would be immediately warned that this is not how it is done and his contribution would be moved to where it belongs. And if he continued this activity, he would be included in a group in which the publication of the contribution is subject to approval. Fortunately, this forum I moderate runs on quite modern software. But let's get back to our topic. Stupid software on an even stupider server probably bears fruit. Let me explain: The stupidity of the forum software lies in the fact that it was probably programmed by incompetent programmers from Prusa and its level corresponds to the years at the turn of the millennium. And that there is software at the level and capabilities of today and some are even free (I won't name them here, I don't feel like looking). And for a company with turnover and profit like Prusa, even the acquisition of some paid modern software should not be liquidating. Even the Prusa store would deserve something more modern than the current one. And then there is the question of proper hardware on which the whole thing runs. If there is a bit of user load (here in Europe it comes in the late afternoon and evening, probably when American users wake up), the server's reaction reminds me of the days of the I486SX as the main processor, when the server response was counted in minutes and it usually ends with that stupid screen about the system "splintering into 500 pieces", i.e. the well-known "error 500" message about an access failure. That probably corresponds to the company management's approach to these discussions, i.e. "do whatever you want here, we don't care". Even if they should be interested, few people have the desire to argue with them on Github, when they react condescendingly to even quite simple requests and comments. And even modern hardware today doesn't cost so much that such an old company couldn't afford it. I know they are trying to develop new and new printers, but that's only because the days of "sleeping on the stove" are irrevocably gone. The competition is driving them mercilessly and is often even better. Well, let's stop complaining, this is an expression of my opinion on the whole matter.