Notifications
Clear all

top layer issue and precision problems  

  RSS
Nisse T
(@nisse-t)
Active Member
top layer issue and precision problems

Hi there,

trying to print an adapter for my small circular saw to fit to my guide rail.

As you can see on picture, on the adapter needs an accurate ~2.5mm wide groove to perfectly slide in the guiderail.

Before printing the real part, I printed a testpart with several grooves with slightly different withs, to find the perfect fit for the real part.

But when printing the the  real part, the groove in the end fits only partly. Also the top layer does not look consistent. I did two prints now, and in each print in one corner the top layer look not really good and in this area the groove is too tight. not really much, but it does not fit in the guide rail. 

What could be the reason? I mean in most of the length the groove is precise an parallel and only in one area it is inaccurate in two indepentent prints.

I was printing with Prusament PLA and am using the original prusa configuration files in prusa slicer. Mk4s (build from a Mk4 using the upgrade kit) with standard 0.4 nozzle.

 

 Thanks for help,

Nils.

Posted : 28/01/2025 6:50 am
Neophyl
(@neophyl)
Illustrious Member
RE: top layer issue and precision problems

Rippling on just a corner like that is usually a sign that the print has warped upwards on that corner and is no longer perfectly flat with the bed.  This causes compression of the layers.  This gives the rippling as the plastic has to go somewhere.

If it was general rippling over more of the surface then you would be looking at insufficient infill to properly support the top layer, in this case though I don't think that's likely as it is limited to the corner.  Carefully examine the bottom of your print and look at it in good light.

This is why we always stress the importance of getting a good first layer and of making sure the print surface is scrupulously clean to get the best adhesion possible.

Posted : 28/01/2025 7:24 am
FoxRun3D liked
Nisse T
(@nisse-t)
Active Member
Topic starter answered:
RE:

Hi there,

thank you for your response!

Warping: maybe yes. I cannot reproduce whether there was loss of bed adhesion locally, but yesterday when I removed the part prom the bed plate (smooth PEI)  there generally did not seem to be an overall bed adhesion problem. I had to bend the plate in two directions several time to de-attach the part.

But nevertheless, I agree  the design can be improved regarding warping. And so I did intorduce the following measures:

  • extra careful cleaning print bed before printing 
  • Introducing radii at the corners to avoid sharp corners
  • introduce corner chamfer to reduce stiffness towards the edges
  • introducing brims locally in the design to avoid lifting in the edges
  • changing print direction to have surface where I need quality now on the print bed and not as top layer. So groove now pointing downwards to print bed,
  • slower print speed for first layer

And I checked carefully after printing. The part was fully attached to the bed.

But still I get similare local effect on the top layer. And the groove fit again only on one side an is too tight in the areas, where I have the top layer defects.

When looking carefully, one the side where the groove is too tight, there is a little bit of overhang a the edge of the top layer. As if locally there is a bit of overextrusion.

At the moment I do not have an idea. What would you think?

Cheers, Nils

Overhang: 

Bottom side, which was attached to bed plate. groove too tight in the area with the top layer defects:

top layer with defects again:

This post was modified 24 hours ago 2 times by Nisse T
Posted : 28/01/2025 10:38 pm
Diem
 Diem
(@diem)
Illustrious Member
RE:

Agreed, warping.  It  has the same appearance as overextrusion but for the opposite reason; as the part warps upwards it slightly reduces the area of the top so the correct amount of extruded filament no longer has quite enough room, and ripples.

One simple trick that might help in some of these cases is to add a few 'decorative' grooves across the top layer so that warping stresses are relieved.

For the flat saw plate you might try annealing.  Put the plate between two flat metal plates and clamp, then place the whole lot in an oven at 100°C for half an hour and allow to cool slowly.  You will probably need to clean up the edges with sandpaper.

Cheerio,

Posted : 28/01/2025 11:28 pm
Brian liked
Nisse T
(@nisse-t)
Active Member
Topic starter answered:
RE: top layer issue and precision problems

Hi Diem,

you might be right: it still seems to be warping:  the surface of the part is not perfectly flat, even though I had tried to reduce warping with a changed design and had the impression after printing, that the part was fully attached to the plate .

I might try the annealing thing to get it fully straight, 

And the groove I have carefully  machined with the dremel locally: now it fits fine. 

My lessons learned is to watch more carefully for warping and optimize the design accordingly for larger precision parts.

Thank you,

Nils

Posted : 29/01/2025 6:55 am
Share: